Search

Propolis – Medicine from the Hive


Propolis is generally known as the “bee glue”, which is a generic name that refers to the resinous substance accumulated by the bees from different types of plants. The word “propolis” is derived from Greek to mean defense for “pro” and city or community for “polis”, or the beehive.1 The honeybees pack the propolis on their hind legs, and carry it back to their colony, where it is combined with beeswax and used as a sealant and sterilant in the colony nest. The bees then use it to coat the inside of the hive, including the passageway and the brood chambers. Thus, propolis functions in sealing holes and cracks and for the reconstruction of the beehive. It is also used for smoothing the inner surface of the beehive, retaining the hive’s internal temperature (35° C), preventing weathering and invasion by predators. Furthermore, propolis hardens the cell wall and contributes to an aseptic internal environment. Propolis generally becomes soft and sticky upon heating or changes consistency with temperature. Propolis has strong antimicrobial properties and has been shown to kill Bacillus larvae, the most important bacterial disease of bees.2 In other words, propolis protects the hive in two ways: first, it reinforces the hive itself; second, it protects the hive from bacterial and viral infection. It is this latter property that medicinally for humans has been found to be helpful through the centuries.


Propolis is collected by honeybees from tree buds or other botanical sources in the North Temperate Zone, which extends from the Tropic of Cancer to the Arctic Circle. The best sources of propolis are species of poplar, willow, birch, elm, alder, beech, conifer, and horse-chestnut trees.3 Its color varies from green to brown and reddish, depending on its botanical source.


Propolis is highly regarded for its medicinal properties for humans, especially in Eastern Europe, South America, and Asia. Propolis has numerous applications in treating various diseases due to its antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antimycotic, antifungal, antiulcer, anticancer, and immunomodulatory properties.4, 5, 6


History of Usage


Bees have used propolis for millions of years, and humans have used it for thousands. Both species find it immensely useful and beneficial. Much of the bees' success in surviving through the ages may be credited to propolis. The Greek physician Hippocrates prescribed the use of propolis to help heal internal and external sores and ulcers. Ancient Egyptians depicted propolis-making bees on vases and other ornaments and used the resinous substance to alleviate many ailments. Pliny, the Roman scholar, wrote much on the use of resins such as propolis in his massive book, Natural History. He touts the abilities of propolis to reduce swelling, soothe pain, and heal sores.7


In The History of Plants, written by John Gerard in 1597, propolis was noted for its ability to provide swift and effective healing for many conditions. During this era, propolis was used in many different healing ointments. Propolis has been used since early times, for various purposes, and especially as a medicine because of its antimicrobial properties.8 Ancient Greek texts refer to the substance as a “cure for bruises and suppurating sores”, and in Rome physicians used propolis in making poultices. The honeybee was a sacred symbol of Artemis and an important design on Ephesian coins for almost 6 centuries.




The Hebrew word for propolis is “tzori”, and the therapeutic properties of tzori are mentioned throughout the Old Testament. Records from 12th century Europe describe medical preparations using propolis for the treatment of mouth and throat infections, as well as dental caries.


Propolis Collection


Beekeeping supply companies often sell traps that can be used to collect propolis. The trap consists of a thin plastic sheet that has narrow slits cut into it and replaces the inner cover on the hive. Over time, bees fill the narrow slits in the plastic when the outer cover is flat on the hive; however, leaving the outer cover propped up to allow light and air in through the top of the hive will encourage the bees to plug up the holes in the propolis trap faster.




Once the trap is plugged up with propolis it is put in a bag and placed in a freezer for at least a few hours. Immediately upon removal from the freezer the trap (still inside the bag) is banged against a hard surface such as a tabletop, or simply contorted and gently bent back and forth in order to cause the brittle propolis to crack, break and fall from the trap.


Propolis can also be collected by catching the hive scrapings when cleaning out the honey supers during the honey harvest. Unlike propolis collected from a trap, hive scrapings will tend to contain contaminants such as bits of wax, wood, dead bees, etc. One way these contaminants can be removed from the propolis is by soaking the scrapings in a pail of water. Dead bees, pieces of wood and beeswax will tend to float while the propolis will tend to sink, allowing the beekeeper to separate out most contaminants.9


Once collected, it is then turned into powder and made into capsules or a tincture. While large companies may make tablets out of propolis, small producers may purchase capsules that can be used to encapsulate the powdered propolis. Alternatively, powdered propolis can be mixed with raw honey to make an especially tasty medicine.


Chemical Properties and Composition of Propolis


The chemical composition of propolis is highly variable because of the broad range of plants visited by honeybees when collecting the substance. Variations in the beeswax content of raw propolis also affect the chemical composition. Thus, the composition of propolis is not fixed and varies considerably from region to region along with vegetation, from season to season, and from hive to hive. In each sample of propolis, more than 80 to 100 chemical compounds are typically identified.10 Altogether, at least 180 different compounds have been identified in propolis to date. A broad analysis revealed approximately 50 constituents in typical European propolis, which comes usually from trees, such as poplars and conifers. These constituents comprise primarily resins and vegetable balsams, mainly cinnamic acid and derivatives, coumaric acid, prenylated compounds, artepillin C (50%), beeswax (30%), essential oils (10%), bee pollen (5%), and minerals, polysaccharides, proteins, amino acids, amines, amides, and organic debris (5%).


The major constituents of propolis from most of the sources are flavonoids.11 Flavonoids play a major role in plant pigmentation. However, the flavonoids present in propolis are different in composition to those normally found in plants, since propolis flavonoids are not glycosides (i.e., they do not have sugar molecules attached to their chemical structure). Numerous flavonoids have been found in propolis, namely, pinocembrin, acacetin, chrysin, rutin, luteolin, kaempferol, apigenin, myricetin, catechin, naringenin, galangin, and quercetin; two phenolic acids, caffeic acid and cinnamic acid; and one stilbene derivative called resveratrol have been detected in propolis extracts by capillary zone electrophoresis. Some of the principal phenolic esters and flavonoids like caffeic acid phenethyl ester, quercetin, baicalin, pinocembrin, naringin, galangin, and chrysin have been found to be responsible for antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities of propolis.12, 13


Propolis has little direct nutritive value but does contain important vitamins, such as vitamins B1, B2, B6, C, and E and useful minerals such as magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sodium (Na), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and iron (Fe). A few enzymes, such as succinic dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphatase, adenosine triphosphatase, and acid phosphatase, are also present in propolis. Vitamins include small amounts of A, B1, B2, B6, C and E.14


Medicinal Properties and Usage of Propolis


Propolis is truly a fascinating compound that has a wide range of therapeutic applications. The following are specific therapeutic effects.


Antimicrobial Effects


Because of its strong antimicrobial activity, propolis is often known as a “natural antibiotic”. One of the earliest investigations of the antibacterial activity of propolis was performed by Kivalkina in the 1940s. Propolis was shown to have bacteriostatic activity against Streptococcus aureus, the typhoid bacillus, and some other bacteria as well.15 Since then numerous studies have been conducted on the antimicrobial activity of propolis. A few of the early studies are summarized in the following table:

Active components of propolis showing an antibacterial effect include pinocembrin, galangin, caffeic acid and ferulic acid. Antifungal components include pinocembrin, pinobanksin, caffeic acid, benzyl ester, sakuranetin and pterostilbene. Anti-viral components include caffeic acid, lutseolin and quercetin. Propolis has been found to inhibit the synthesis of protein by bacteria, which may account for at least some of its antimicrobial effects. Keep in mind that bees mix saliva or “bee lymph derived secretions” with plant resins in making propolis. Peptides in honeybee lymph have been shown to be antimicrobial.38, 39, 40


Propolis Anticancer Effects


Probably one of the most exciting areas of propolis research is in its anti-cancerous and anti-tumorous properties. Much of is anti-cancerous effects result from its effect on the immune system. Propolis activates immune cells that produce cytokines and macrophages. Two main immunopotent chemicals in propolis have been identified as artepillin C and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE). Propolis, CAPE, and artepillin C have both been shown to activate macrophage function in destroying tumors. They also have potential antitumor properties by different postulated mechanisms such as suppressing cancer cells proliferation via its anti-inflammatory effects; decreasing the cancer stem cell populations; blocking specific oncogene signaling pathways; exerting antiangiogenic effects; and modulating the tumor microenvironment. The good bioavailability by the oral route and good historical safety profile make propolis an ideal adjuvant agent for immunomodulatory or anticancer regimens.


Artepillin C in propolis has been shown to cause significant damage to solid tumor and leukemic cells by the MTT assay, DNA synthesis assay, and morphological observation in vitro. When xenografts of human tumor cells were transplanted into nude mice, the cytotoxic effects of artepillin C were most noticeable in carcinoma and malignant melanoma. Apoptosis, abortive mitosis, and massive necrosis combined were identified by histological observation after intratumor injection of 500 g of artepillin C three times a week. In addition to suppression of tumor growth, there was an increase in the ratio of CD4/CD8 T cells, and in the total number of helper T cells. These findings indicate that artepillin C activates the immune system, and possesses direct antitumor activity .41


The cancer inhibitory effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) has been confirmed in a variety of culture cell lines. A particularly high concentration of this compound was found in the New Zealand propolis called BIO 30 and shown to suppress tumor growth.42, 43, 44




Previous studies have shown the usefulness of CAPE through its anti-inflammatory45, 46, 47, immunostimulatory and antitumor activity.48, 49, 50 CAPE exhibits strong antitumor effects in oral cancer cells, including the neck and tongue, and many proteins involved in the apoptotic process are affected by CAPE.51


Propolis Oral Health Benefits


The oral cavity has an abundant bacterial microflora and excessive bacterial growth may lead to not only oral diseases but also systemic diseases. Studies have shown that propolis may restrict bacterial-plaque development and periodontitis-causing pathogens because of its antibacterial properties.52 Propolis solutions exert a selectively lower cytotoxic action on human gum fibroblasts compared to chlorhexidine. In addition, mouthwash containing propolis has shown effectiveness in healing surgical wounds.53 Propolis solution can also be used to disinfect toothbrushes.54 Propolis toothpaste and/or mouthwash is used for its ability to reduce growth of bacterial plaque and pathogenic microflora that cause gingivitis and periodontitis.


Propolis Wound Healing and Tissue Repair Effects


It has long been known that propolis and its extracts have a positive effect on tissue regeneration. Research has shown that an application of an alcoholic solution of propolis accelerates the tissue regeneration process.55 As far back as 1977, Polish researchers showed that application of ethanol extract of propolis promotes the healing processes in damaged cartilage56 as well as enhances ossification in artificially-induced bone defects.57 It has also been demonstrated that propolis extract supports regeneration of dental pulp and reduces inflammatory and degenerative processes as well.58 Part of the healing effect is because propolis stimulates various enzyme systems affecting cell metabolism, microcirculation and collagen formation.


Gastro-Intestinal Effects


Gastric and duodenal ulcers affect a considerable number of people in the world and are induced by several factors, such as: stress, smoking, nutritional deficiencies and ingestion of certain drugs, such as non-steroidal-anti-inflammatories. The current medicinal treatment of peptic ulcer is generally based on the inhibition of gastric acid secretion by histamine H2 antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors and antimuscarinics. However, most of these drugs produce adverse reactions, such as hypersensitivity, arrhythmia, and hematopoietic changes. Thus, it is necessary to develop more effective and less toxic antiulcer approaches that improve the gastrointestinal microbiome and its function. Propolis has long been used for digestive problems and has been shown to inhibit the development of stomach ulcers.59, 60, 61 It appears that the flavonoid components of propolis are primarily responsible for its antiulcer effects.62 In several studies propolis has been shown to improve different types of colitis. 63, 64, 65


Cardiovascular Effect


The modulation of cardiovascular disease markers by propolis has been shown in several studies. In vitro and in vivo assays have described the molecular mechanisms of its beneficial effect: regulation of glucose and lipoprotein metabolism; decrease of oxidative stress; improvement of endothelial function; inhibition of platelet aggregation; and reduction of blood pressure.


Propolis has been shown to modulate lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Propolis administration has diminished liver cholesterol and triglyceride content and decreased the rate of hepatic triglyceride synthesis in rats.66, 67 Polyphenols from propolis inhibited the progression of atherosclerosis in mice by improving the lipid profile and by downregulating proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and angiogenic factors.68


Platelet aggregation is a major contributor to the atherosclerotic process. Propolis components have been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation. Specifically, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) in propolis has been shown to markedly inhibited collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation. As CAPE is involved in various inhibitory pathways influencing platelet aggregation, it may be an important contributor to the potent antiplatelet actions of propolis.69 In several animal studies, a concentrated extract of propolis has been shown to reduce blood pressure.70, 71 Overall, propolis constituents have been shown to be beneficial for many causes of cardiovascular disease.


Adverse Effects of Propolis


Propolis is not known to be toxic to humans or mammals unless very large quantities are administered.73 The main adverse effect reported by beekeepers, which consume and come into daily contact with the raw product is contact dermatitis. Dermatitis can be produced by skin contact with raw propolis, as well as propolis extracts and products containing caffeic acid and its derivatives have been identified as the major allergenic agent.74, 75, 76 Dermatitis is relieved once the skin is no longer in contact with the propolis product. It is therefore recommended that with all preparations intended for human use, usage is ceased whenever there is an allergic reaction. Rare cases of oral inflammation and ulceration, mouth edema (swelling) and stomatitis have been reported as a result of oral ingestion of propolis.77, 78 Very few other adverse reactions have been documented in the literature, and the product is considered generally not to be harmful.


Conclusion


Recorded use of propolis dates to c. 3000 BC and continues today in the form of home remedies, toothpastes, creams, ointments, tinctures, capsules and in dietary supplements. Its numerous beneficial medicinal properties have long been appreciated. There are clearly a multitude of options for future research related to propolis ranging from its chemical attributes for human health, to understanding the individual and colony-level mechanisms of resin foraging, to the possible applicability for propolis as a treatment against bee pathogens and diseases.


References


  1. Castaldo, S., & Capasso, F. (2002). Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia, 73, S1-S6.

  2. Mlagan, V., and D. Sulimanovic. Action of propolis solutions on Bacillus larvae. Apiacta; an international technical magazine of apicultural and economic information (1982).

  3. Ghisalberti, E. L. Propolis: a review. Bee world 60, no. 2 (1979): 59-84.

  4. Banskota A.H., Tezuka Y., Kadota S. (2001) Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis, Phytother. Res. 15, 561–571.

  5. Sforcin J.M. (2007) Propolis and immune system: a review, J. Ethnopharmacol. 113, 1–14.

  6. Viuda-Martos M., Ruiz-Navajas Y., Fernández-López J., Pérez-Álvarez J.A. (2008) Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly, J. Food Sci. 73, 117–124.

  7. Bees, in Pliny the Elder, the Natural History, J. Bostock and H. T. Riley, Eds., chapter 4, Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 1855, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0137%3Abook%3D11%3Achapter%3D4.

  8. Simone-Finstrom, Michael, and Marla Spivak. Propolis and bee health: the natural history and significance of resin use by honeybees. Apidologie 41, no. 3 (2010): 295-311.

  9. Crane E. (1990) Bees and beekeeping, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

  10. Marcucci, María Cristina, Federico Ferreres, C. Garcıa-Viguera, V. S. Bankova, S. L. De Castro, A. P. Dantas, P. H. M. Valente, and Niraldo Paulino. Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities. Journal of ethnopharmacology 74, no. 2 (2001): 105-112.

  11. Savickas, A., D. Majiene, K. Ramanauskiene, A. Pavilonis, J. Muselik, R. Masteikova, and Z. Chalupova. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Lithuanian and Czech propolis. Biologija 4 (2005).

  12. Grange, J. M., and R. W. Davey. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 83, no. 3 (1990): 159-160.

  13. Ghisalberti, E. L. Propolis: a review. Bee world 60, no. 2 (1979): 59-84.

  14. Lotfy, Mahmoud. Biological activity of bee propolis in health and disease. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 7, no. 1 (2006): 22-31.

  15. Kivalkina B. P., in Pchelovodstvoin, vol. 10, 1948, Ghisalberti, 1979.

  16. Mlagan, V., and D. Sulimanovic. Action of propolis solutions on Bacillus larvae. Apiacta; an international technical magazine of apicultural and economic information (1982).

  17. Itoh, K., Amamiya, I., Ikeda, S., & Konishi, M. (1994). Anti-Helicobacter pylori substances in propolis 1124. Honeybee Science, 15(4), 171-173.

  18. Grange, J. M., and R. W. Davey. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 83, no. 3 (1990): 159-160.

  19. Karimova, Z. H., and E. I. Rodionova. Propolis in the treatment of lung tuberculosis. A valuable product of beekeeping: propolis. Apimondia (1975).

  20. Grange, J. M., and R. W. Davey. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 83, no. 3 (1990): 159-160.

  21. CHERNYAK, NF. ACTION SYNERGIQUE DE PROPOLIS ET DE QUELQUES PRODUITS ANTIBACTERIENS. (1973).

  22. Kedzia, B., and E. Holderna. Investigations upon the combined action of antibiotics and propolis on Staphylococcus aureus. Herba Polonica 32 (1986): 187-195.

  23. Rojas, Hernández, and Bernal Cuétara. Antibiotic effect of propolis against strains of Staphylococcus aureus of human clinical origin. Revista Cubana de Farmacia 24, no. 1 (1990): 45-50.

  24. Simuth, J., J. Trnovský, and J. Jelokova. Inhibition of bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerases and restriction endonuclease by UV-absorbing components from propolis. Die Pharmazie 41, no. 2 (1986): 131-132.

  25. Ikeno, K., T. Ikeno, and C. Miyazawa. Effects of propolis on dental caries in rats. Caries Research 25, no. 5 (1991): 347-351.

  26. Simuth, J., J. Trnovský, and J. Jelokova. Inhibition of bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerases and restriction endonuclease by UV-absorbing components from propolis. Die Pharmazie 41, no. 2 (1986): 131-132.

  27. Okonenko, L. B. Propolis kak ingibitor svobodnoradikal'nogo okisleniia lipidov pri sal'monelleze. Вопросы медицинской химии 32, no. 3 (1986): 45-48.

  28. Freitas, S. F., Shinohara, L., Sforcin, J. M., & Guimarães, S. (2006). In vitro effects of propolis on Giardia duodenalis trophozoites. Phytomedicine, 13(3), 170-175.

  29. Munoz, L. G. Prevention of legs' affections in ovines using propolis. Apiacta 24, no. 3 (1989): 80-81.

  30. Dimov, V., N. Ivanovska, N. Manolova, V. Bankova, N. Nikolov, and S. Popov. Immunomodulatory action of propolis. Influence on anti-infectious protection and macrophage function. Apidologie 22, no. 2 (1991): 155-162.

  31. Holderna, E., and B. Kedzia. Investigation upon the combined action of propolis and antimycotic drugs on Candida albicans. Herba Pol 33, no. 2 (1987): 145-151.

  32. La Torre, A., G. Imbroglini, and M. Guccione. Action of propolis based preparations against Botrytis cinerea Pers. of strawberry. First Observation Agric 6 (1990): 169-177.

  33. Ross, Peter Blaise. The effects of propolis fractions on cells in tissue culture. The effects of propolis fractions on cells in tissue culture. (1990).

  34. Vynograd, N., I. Vynograd, and Z. Sosnowski. A comparative multi-centre study of the efficacy of propolis, acyclovir and placebo in the treatment of genital herpes (HSV). Phytomedicine 7, no. 1 (2000): 1-6.

  35. Fahmy, F. G., and M. O. M. Omar. Effect of propolis extracts on certain potato viruses. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Apiculture in Tropical Climates, Cairo, Egypt, 6-10 November 1988/hosted by the government of Egypt; convened by the International Bee Research Association. London: International Bee Research Association, 1989.

  36. Serkedjieva, J., N. Manolova, and V. Bankova. Anti-influenza virus effect of some propolis constituents and their analogues (esters of substituted cinnamic acids). Journal of Natural Products 55, no. 3 (1992): 294-297.

  37. Maksimova-Todorova, V., N. Manolova, G. Gegova, Iu Serkedzhieva, and S. Uzunov. Antiviral action of fractions isolated from propolis. Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica 17 (1985): 79.

  38. Danihlík, Jiří, Kate Aronstein, and Marek Petřivalský. Antimicrobial peptides: a key component of honey bee innate immunity: Physiology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Journal of Apicultural Research 54, no. 2 (2015): 123-136.

  39. Ilyasov, Rustem, Louisa Gaifullina, Elena Saltykova, Aleksandr Poskryakov, and Alexei Nikolenko. Review of the expression of antimicrobial peptide defensin in honey bees Apis mellifera L. Journal of Apicultural Science 56, no. 1 (2012): 115-124.

  40. Danihlík, Jiří, Marek Šebela, Marek Petřivalský, and René Lenobel. A sensitive quantification of the peptide apidaecin 1 isoforms in single bee tissues using a weak cation exchange pre-separation and nanocapillary liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Journal of chromatography A 1374 (2014): 134-144.

  41. Kimoto T, Arai S, Kohguchi M, et al (1998). Apoptosis and suppression of tumor growth by artepillin C extracted from Brazilian propolis. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 22, 506 - 15.

  42. Demestre, M., S. M. Messerli, N. Celli, M. Shahhossini, L. Kluwe, V. Mautner, and H. Maruta. CAPE (caffeic acid phenethyl ester)‐based propolis extract (Bio 30) suppresses the growth of human neurofibromatosis (NF) tumor xenografts in mice. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives 23, no. 2 (2009): 226-230.

  43. Catchpole, Owen, Kevin Mitchell, Stephen Bloor, Paul Davis, and Amanda Suddes. Antiproliferative activity of New Zealand propolis and phenolic compounds vs human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. Fitoterapia 106 (2015): 167-174.

  44. Messerli, Shanta M., Mok‐Ryeon Ahn, Kazuhiro Kunimasa, Miyako Yanagihara, Tomoki Tatefuji, Ken Hashimoto, Victor Mautner et al. Artepillin C (ARC) in Brazilian green propolis selectively blocks oncogenic PAK1 signaling and suppresses the growth of NF tumors in mice. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives 23, no. 3 (2009): 423-427.

  45. Rossi A, Ligresti A, Longo R, Russo A, Borrelli F, Sautebin L. The inhibitory effect of propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester on cyclooxygenase activity in J774 macrophages. Phytomedicine. 2002;9:530–535.

  46. Ilhan A, Akyol O, Gurel A, Armutcu F, Iraz M, Oztas E. Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester against experimental allergic encephalomyelitis-induced oxidative stress in rats. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:386–394.

  47. Koksel O, Ozdulger A, Tamer L et al. Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in rats. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19:90–95.

  48. Yokoyama, Takeshi, Yuto Kosaka, and Mineyuki Mizuguchi. Inhibitory activities of propolis and its promising component, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, against amyloidogenesis of human transthyretin. Journal of medicinal chemistry 57, no. 21 (2014): 8928-8935.

  49. Orsolic N, Knezevic AH, Sver L, Terzic S, Basic I. Immunomodulatory and antimetastatic action of propolis and related polyphenolic compounds. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;94:307–315.

  50. Ansorge S, Reinhold D, Lendeckel U. Propolis and some of its constituents down-regulate DNA synthesis and inflammatory cytokine production but induce TGF-b 1 production of human immune cells. Z Naturforsch C. 2003;58:580–589.

  51. Lee, Yean-Jang, Pel-Hu Liao, Wen-Kang Chen, and Chi-Chiang Yang. Preferential cytotoxicity of caffeic acid phenethyl ester analogues on oral cancer cells. Cancer letters 153, no. 1-2 (2000): 51-56.

  52. Pereira, Elizete Maria Rita, João Luís Duval Cândido da Silva, Fernando Freitas Silva, Mariana Passos De Luca, Telma Campos Medeiros Lorentz, and Vagner Rodrigues Santos. Clinical evidence of the efficacy of a mouthwash containing propolis for the control of plaque and gingivitis: a phase II study. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2011 (2011).

  53. Jain, Sambhav, Rohit Rai, Vandana Sharma, and Manu Batra. Propolis in oral health: a natural remedy. World J Pharm Sci 2, no. 1 (2014): 90-4.

  54. Bertolini, Patrícia Fernanda Roesler, Oswaldo Biondi Filho, Arnaldo Pomilio, Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro, and Meghi Silva de Carvalho. Antimicrobial capacity of Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice against Streptococcus mutans strains in toothbrushes: an in vitro study. Journal of applied oral science 20, no. 1 (2012): 32-37.

  55. Sutta J. et al. Experimental and clinical experience of the treatment of wounds of domestic animals with a locally applied solution of propolis, Folia Veterinaria, vol. 18, pp. 143–147, 1975 (Slovak).

  56. Scheller, S., A. Stojko, I. Szwarnowiecka, J. Tustanowski, and Z. Obuszko. Biological properties and clinical application of propolis. VI. Investigation of the influence of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on cartilaginous tissue regeneration. Arzneimittel-Forschung 27, no. 11 (1977): 2138-2140.

  57. Stojko, A., S. Scheller, I. Szwarnowiecka, J. Tustanowski, H. Ostach, and Z. Obuszko. Biological properties and clinical application of propolis. VIII. Experimental observation on the influence of ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) on the regeneration of bone tissue. Arzneimittel-Forschung 28, no. 1 (1978): 35-37.

  58. Scheller, S., L. Ilewicz, M. Luciak, D. Skrobidurska, A. Stojko, and W. Matuga. Biological properties and clinical application of propolis. IX. Experimental observation on the influence of ethanol extract of propolis (EEP) on dental pulp regeneration. Arzneimittel-Forschung 28, no. 2 (1978): 289-291.

  59. de Barros, Muriel Primon, João Paulo Barreto Sousa, Jairo Kenupp Bastos, and Sérgio Faloni de Andrade. Effect of Brazilian green propolis on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 110, no. 3 (2007): 567-571.

  60. de Barros, Muriel Primon, Marivane Lemos, Edson Luis Maistro, Mateus Freire Leite, João Paulo Barreto Sousa, Jairo Kennup Bastos, and Sérgio Faloni de Andrade. Evaluation of antiulcer activity of the main phenolic acids found in Brazilian Green Propolis. Journal of ethnopharmacology 120, no. 3 (2008): 372-377.

  61. Pillai, S. Iyyam, M. Kandaswamy, and S. Subramanian. Antiulcerogenic and ulcer healing effects of Indian propolis in experimental rat ulcer models. Journal of Api Product and ApiMedical Science 2, no. 1 (2010): 21-28.

  62. Ciaceri, G., and G. Attaguile. Influence of luteoline, apigenine and acacetine on experimental gastric ulcer. Minerva medica 63, no. 29 (1972): 1665-1668.

  63. Okamoto, Yoshihiro, Takazumi Hara, Tatsuya Ebato, Takashi Fukui, and Toshiyuki Masuzawa. Brazilian propolis ameliorates trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis in mice by inhibiting Th1 differentiation. International immunopharmacology 16, no. 2 (2013): 178-183.

  64. Wang, Kai, Xiaolu Jin, Mengmeng You, Wenli Tian, Richard Leu, David Topping, Michael Conlon, Liming Wu, and Fuliang Hu. Dietary propolis ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis and modulates the gut microbiota in rats fed a western diet. Nutrients 9, no. 8 (2017): 875.

  65. Bezerra, Gislaine Barbosa, Luana de Menezes de Souza, Adailma Santana dos Santos, Grace Kelly Melo de Almeida, Marília Trindade Santana Souza, Sandra Lauton Santos, Enilton Aparecido Camargo et al. Hydroalcoholic extract of Brazilian red propolis exerts protective effects on acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in a rodent model. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 85 (2017): 687-696.

  66. Li, Yajing, Minli Chen, Hongzhuan Xuan, and Fuliang Hu. Effects of encapsulated propolis on blood glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2012 (2012).

  67. Fuliang, H. U., H. R. Hepburn, Hongzhuan Xuan, Minli Chen, S. Daya, and S. E. Radloff. Effects of propolis on blood glucose, blood lipid and free radicals in rats with diabetes mellitus. Pharmacological Research 51, no. 2 (2005): 147-152.

  68. Daleprane, Julio Beltrame, Vanessa da Silva Freitas, Alejandro Pacheco, Martina Rudnicki, Luciane Aparecida Faine, Felipe Augusto Dörr, Masaharu Ikegaki, Luis Antonio Salazar, Thomas Prates Ong, and Dulcinéia Saes Parra Abdalla. Anti-atherogenic and anti-angiogenic activities of polyphenols from propolis. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 23, no. 6 (2012): 557-566.

  69. Chen, T., J. Lee, K. Lin, C. Shen, D. Chou, and J. Sheu. Antiplatelet activity of caffeic acid phenethyl ester is mediated through a cyclic GMP-dependent pathway in human platelets. Chinese Journal of Physiology 50, no. 3 (2007): 121.

  70. Kubota, Yoko, Keizo Umegaki, Kyoko Kobayashi, Naoko Tanaka, Satomi Kagota, Kazuki Nakamura, Masaru Kunitomo, and Kazumasa Shinozuka. Anti‐hypertensive effects of Brazilian propolis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 31 (2004): S29-S30.

  71. Daleprane, Julio Beltrame, and Dulcinéia Saes Abdalla. Emerging roles of propolis: antioxidant, cardioprotective, and antiangiogenic actions. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2013 (2013).

  72. Ghisalberti E.L. (1979) Propolis: a review, Bee World 60, 59–84.

  73. Burdock, G. A. (1998). Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food and Chemical toxicology, 36(4), 347-363.

  74. de Groot, A. C. (2013). Propolis: a review of properties, applications, chemical composition, contact allergy, and other adverse effects. Dermatitis, 24(6), 263-282.

  75. Hausen, B. M., E. Wollenweber, H. Senff, and B. Post. Propolis allergy: (I). Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact dermatitis 17, no. 3 (1987): 163-170.

  76. Cirasino, L., A. Pisati, and F. Fasani. Contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact dermatitis 16, no. 2 (1987): 110-111.

  77. Hay, K. D., and D. E. Greig. Propolis allergy: a cause of oral mucositis with ulceration. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology 70, no. 5 (1990): 584-586.

  78. Wanscher, B. Contact dermatitis from propolis. British Journal of Dermatology 94, no. 4 (1976): 451-456.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

© 2017-2020 Dr. James Odell, ND, OMD, L.Ac. 

THE CONTENT ON THIS SITE IS PRESENTED IN SUMMARY FORM, IS GENERAL IN NATURE, AND IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; IT IS NOT ADVICE, NOR SHOULD IT BE TREATED AS SUCH. If you have any healthcare-related concerns, please call or see your physician or other qualified healthcare provider. This site is NOT intended to be a substitute for a healthcare provider’s consultation: NEVER DISREGARD MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY IN SEEKING IT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE SEEN ON THIS SITE. We make no representations, nor any warranties, nor assume any liability for the content herein; nor do we endorse any particular product, provider, or service.